Final answer:
Evidence that supports an inference is strong when it is reliable and the conclusion is probably true based on that evidence. The context sets the standard for the strength of evidence, with legal matters requiring a higher probability for evidence to be compelling. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence, and a hypothesis with ample support becomes more credible.
Step-by-step explanation:
When is Evidence Considered Strong?
When evaluating inferences, the strength of evidence plays a crucial role. Evidence that supports an inference is considered strong when it is reliable, and there is a high probability that the conclusion drawn from this evidence is true. The context also determines the necessary strength for evidence to be considered compelling; different scenarios demand different levels of probability. For instance, in legal cases, the required probability for evidence to be considered valid is far greater than in casual inferences.
Moreover, the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence underlines that in order for novel theories to be accepted, they must be accompanied by an overwhelming amount of support, especially if they are to overturn established beliefs. In the field of science, a hypothesis becomes stronger as more experimental data supports it, and it may eventually be accepted as correct until proven otherwise, though it is worth noting that no hypothesis can ever be proven conclusively true due to the potential for new evidence to emerge.
There are also specific criteria for judging competing hypotheses in science. Among these, the preponderance of evidence, simplicity, and ability to explain phenomena effectively are key. Concrete examples, such as physical evidence of an occurrence or event, lend additional strength to inferences.