Final answer:
McKinley and Beveridge both advocate for immediate intervention, but differ in their emphasis on economic interests and moral duty. McKinley focuses on economic alliances while Beveridge focuses on moral alliances in justifying U.S. control over the Philippines.
Step-by-step explanation:
McKinley’s and Beveridge’s arguments for war are similar in that they both advocate for immediate intervention, but they differ in their emphasis on economic interests and moral duty. McKinley focuses on economic interests, while Beveridge emphasizes the moral duty of the United States to control the Philippines.
Both authors do not argue for isolationism, as McKinley requests a declaration of war from Congress and Beveridge justifies U.S. control over the Philippines. They also disagree on the importance of alliances, as McKinley highlights economic alliances while Beveridge focuses on moral alliances.