Question

Political Justifications for the War: Consider the arguments you read in the two readings. Think about the audience and purpose for each and the specific details and perspectives each provides. In the notes box below, summarize McKinley’s and Beveridge’s arguments and describe how they are similar and how they are different.

a. They both advocate for immediate intervention.
b. McKinley emphasizes economic interests, while Beveridge focuses on moral duty.
c. Both authors argue for isolationism.
d. They disagree on the importance of alliances.

Answer 1

McKinley and Beveridge both advocate for immediate intervention, but differ in their emphasis on economic interests and moral duty. McKinley focuses on economic alliances while Beveridge focuses on moral alliances in justifying U.S. control over the Philippines.

Step-by-step explanation:

McKinley’s and Beveridge’s arguments for war are similar in that they both advocate for immediate intervention, but they differ in their emphasis on economic interests and moral duty. McKinley focuses on economic interests, while Beveridge emphasizes the moral duty of the United States to control the Philippines.

Both authors do not argue for isolationism, as McKinley requests a declaration of war from Congress and Beveridge justifies U.S. control over the Philippines. They also disagree on the importance of alliances, as McKinley highlights economic alliances while Beveridge focuses on moral alliances.