Question

You have been designated the task of creating a universal emergency evacuation plan for people who live near volcanoes. What are the key differences in the evacuation plans for residents near composite, shield, and cinder cone volcanoes?

Options:
A. Evacuation plans for composite volcanoes are the same as for shield volcanoes.
B. Evacuation plans for cinder cone volcanoes prioritize staying indoors.
C. Evacuation plans for shield volcanoes are similar to composite volcanoes but involve longer distances.
D. Evacuation plans for composite volcanoes focus on swift evacuation due to potential pyroclastic flows, while shield volcanoes emphasize relocation to lower elevations.

Answer 1

Evacuation plans for composite, shield, and cinder cone volcanoes differ based on the specific hazards associated with each type of volcano.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evacuation plans for residents near composite, shield, and cinder cone volcanoes differ based on the specific hazards associated with each type of volcano. The key differences are as follows:

1. Composite volcanoes are characterized by explosive eruptions that can produce pyroclastic flows. Therefore, evacuation plans for composite volcanoes focus on swift evacuation to safer areas outside the range of pyroclastic flows.
2. Shield volcanoes typically have less explosive eruptions and produce fluid lava flows. Evacuation plans for shield volcanoes are similar to composite volcanoes but may involve longer distances due to the potential spread of lava.
3. Cinder cone volcanoes are usually smaller and produce explosive eruptions. Evacuation plans for cinder cone volcanoes prioritize staying indoors and taking precautions against ashfall and potential projectile hazards.