Final answer:
The question evaluates who serves better based on how Usha and Priti spend their pocket money. Usha buys a gift and chocolates for poor children, whereas Priti spends all on a toy for a friend. This reflects broader social contribution versus personal relationship focus.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question about Usha and Priti's decisions with their pocket money involves evaluating who is serving better, which entails understanding the social responsibility and personal values reflected in theiractions. Usha sets aside some money for a gift and also buys chocolates for poor children, while Priti uses her money solely to buy a toy for her friend. Conceptually, this prompts us to consider the ethics of household decision making and the allocation of resources to maximize not just personal satisfaction, but also social welfare.
In this scenario, arguing that one person is serving 'better' than the other could be subjective. Usha might be seen as serving better because she is thinking of multiple individuals: both her friend and the poor children. This broader scope of generosity can be considered a greater social contribution. On the other hand, Priti is focusing on making her friend happy with a personal gesture, which also has its own value in nurturing personal relationships.
To make an informed decision, we should understand that both approaches to spending pocket money have their merits. However, if the measure of 'serving better' is based on the impact on a larger community, Usha's choice to help more than one individual might be seen as the answer. Yet, it is important that we also value Priti's sole focus on her friend's happiness, as personal relationships are crucial components of social well-being.