Final answer:
The student is tasked with a logic puzzle involving deductive reasoning about school closures and weather conditions. They must identify an invalid argument form, known as 'Affirming the Consequent,' which fails to accurately establish the cause of the school closing solely on the premise provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
The principal is facing a challenge where Jack Frost has stolen the passwords necessary to declare a school closure during adverse weather conditions. It appears that the student needs to solve a series of logical puzzles involving weather and school policies. One of these logical sequences provided is an example of the invalid deductive inference often referred to as 'Affirming the Consequent.' This is shown in the steps:
- If it snows more than three inches, the schools are mandated to close.
- The schools closed.
- Therefore, it snowed more than three inches.
However, this form of argument is invalid because the second premise does not necessarily imply the first condition has been met; other factors could have led to the school's closure. It is crucial for students to recognize fallacies in arguments to strengthen their critical thinking and logical reasoning skills.