197k views
3 votes
Why do you think the drafters of the Articles of Confederation chose not to create an executive or judiciary branch of the federal government?

a) To concentrate power in the legislative branch
b) To weaken the central government
c) Due to a fear of a monarchy-like government
d) All of the above

User AKornich
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The drafters of the Articles of Confederation avoided creating an executive or judiciary to prevent any concentration of power akin to a monarchy, instead emphasizing state sovereignty and a weaker central government.

d is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

The drafters of the Articles of Confederation made a deliberated choice not to create an executive or judiciary branch. This decision can be attributed to all the options provided: a) To concentrate power in the legislative branch, b) To weaken the central government, and c) Due to a fear of a monarchy-like government.

Having experienced tyranny under the British monarchy, there was a strong reluctance to establish another potentially authoritative entity. Consequently, the Articles of Confederation favored strong state sovereignty and created a weak central government with no independent chief executive or judiciary. The Confederation Congress held limited powers, and any significant action required a supermajority. Such measures ensured that the power remained with the states, and the risk of a monarchical-like power concentration at the federal level was minimized.

User Xinran Shen
by
8.2k points