Final answer:
To determine which text, 'Winter Break' or 'Curriculum Notes: 9th Grade,' makes a more compelling argument, one must evaluate each text's thesis, reasoning, and evidence, as well as the effectiveness of transitions and supporting details.
Step-by-step explanation:
To ascertain which of the two texts makes a more compelling argument about the change to the reading list, one must analyze the effectiveness of each in terms of thesis, reasoning, and evidence. First, evaluating 'Winter Break,' we should look at the clarity of its thesis and how well it uses evidence to support its argument. On the other side, examining 'Curriculum Notes: 9th Grade,' we need to assess how effectively it employs reasoning and provides evidence for its argument regarding adjustments in the reading list. Both texts should also be analyzed for their effectiveness in engaging with the audience through the structure of their arguments, the quality of transitions between points, and the completeness and relevance of their supporting details.
'Winter Break' may provide anecdotal evidence or a compelling narrative that resonates with readers on an emotional level. Meanwhile, 'Curriculum Notes: 9th Grade' might offer a logical and well-reasoned argument that appeals to a reader's intellect. An effective argument should unify both narrative and factual elements to paint a comprehensive picture that persuades the reader. Therefore, to determine which text is more compelling, it is essential to compare both text's approaches in articulating their positions and how they employ similarities and differences to reinforce their arguments. The essay should ultimately focus on juxtaposing the nuances between each text's approach to similar topics to illuminate our understanding of the argument at hand.