Final answer:
The question is a metaphorical one, suggesting a comparison between controlling one powerful leader far away versus multiple weaker leaders nearby.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question you're asking appears to be a metaphorical question rather than a specific historical event. Based on the information provided, a possible interpretation could be:
If you have the power to control one powerful leader (represented by a tyrant) who is far away, it might be more beneficial to have control over multiple weaker leaders (represented by the 3000 tyrants) who are closer to you.
This metaphor implies that it could be easier for a leader to maintain control and exert influence over smaller, nearby entities rather than one powerful but distant entity.