Final answer:
Whether Helen is a hero or villain depends on her actions, values, and cultural interpretation. Heroism involves positive traits that can become tragic flaws, and cultures reward heroes with recognition. Layers of trickery in a narrative can reveal a character's true nature as either heroic or villainous.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine whether Helen would be considered a hero or a villain in a story, we must look at the specific context of her actions and the values of the culture within the narrative. The role of a hero, or "she-roe", coined by Maya Angelou, often embodies positive attributes that remain consistent over time, such as bravery, selflessness, and righteousness. However, these attributes can sometimes become tragic flaws if they lead to negative consequences or cause harm. Cultures usually reward or recognize their heroes through accolades, monuments, or storytelling, which help construct narratives about their experiences and values.
A character like Helen may become a hero if she demonstrates self-sacrifice for a greater good or overcomes significant adversity. On the other hand, if her actions result in harm or if she acts out of selfishness or deception, she may be perceived as a villain. The responses to Helen's character would likely depend on her motivations, the outcomes of her actions, and the cultural values of the audience interpreting her story.
When examining layers of trickery in a story, the outcome of who wins or loses can further illuminate a hero or a villain's true nature. For example, in stories where heroes face moral dilemmas or must outwit adversaries, the resolution often reveals their core values and can either reaffirm or subvert their heroic status.