Question

Sam frantically searched his younger brother's bedroom. He had come into Frank's room on a quest for his library book and noticed that the large, black metal and blue plastic cage that housed Frank's pet hamster was unoccupied. Sam then observed that the door to the cage was open; Sam speculated that Frank must not have latched the cage securely after he had finished playing with Alexander earlier that day. If Alexander managed to escape from Frank's room, everyone in his family would be irritated with both Sam and Frank.

What did Sam notice about the cage that housed Frank's pet hamster?

a. It was open.
b. It was securely latched.
c. It was green in color.
d. It was a small cage.

Answer 1

Sam's frantic search of his younger brother's bedroom revealed that the pet hamster, Alexander, was missing. The open cage suggested that Frank might not have securely latched it after playing with the hamster earlier. If Alexander escaped, both Sam and Frank would likely face irritation from their family. So the answer is a. It was open.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this scenario, the urgency of Sam's search stems from the potential consequences of Alexander, the pet hamster, escaping Frank's room. The open cage and Sam's speculation about the insecure latch indicate a possible oversight on Frank's part. The family's irritation is anticipated, as the responsibility for the pet's well-being rests on both Sam and Frank. This situation not only highlights the importance of securing pet enclosures but also emphasizes the need for shared responsibility in caring for family pets. The emotional and relational impact of the potential escape adds a layer of tension to the narrative, creating a sense of urgency in Sam's actions.

The narrative's tension arises from the delicate balance of responsibility between the two brothers. Sam's quest for his library book evolves into a mission to prevent a larger problem—Alexander's escape. The open cage serves as a visual cue for the impending issue, and Sam's realization of the potential consequences heightens the stakes. The family's irritation is a logical reaction, considering the shared responsibility for the pet's safety. Overall, the scenario encapsulates a common family dynamic, where overlooked responsibilities can lead to unexpected challenges and interpersonal tensions. So the answer is a. It was open.