Final answer:
The balance of power between the Legislative and Executive Branches varies depending on the system of government; in the U.S. the branches are intended to have equal power through checks and balances.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on what you learned so far about the Legislative and Executive Branches, the degree of power each branch has can vary depending on the governmental system in place. In a presidential system, there is a clearer separation of powers between these branches, with the president having limited involvement in the legislative process. Conversely, in a parliamentary system, the head of government, such as a prime minister, also holds a leadership position within the legislative body, indicating a closer relationship and potentially more influence between the two branches.
In the context of the United States, the Constitution delineates a system of checks and balances to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. While certain situations may grant more apparent power to one branch (like the governor's influence over state legislature mentioned), by design, both the Legislative and Executive Branches have powers that are balanced and can be moderated by the other's actions. For example, Congress (Legislative Branch) makes the laws, but the President (Executive Branch) has the power to veto legislation. Conversely, the President can make executive appointments, but the Senate must confirm them. Therefore, while the balance of power may shift in response to specific circumstances and variations in state government structures, at a federal level, both branches were intended to have equal power, with neither being absolutely dominant over the other.