Question

"Read the following excerpt from A Letter From Birmingham Jail and answer the question below:

But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos41 an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream." Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: "I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God." And John Bunyan: "I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience." And Abraham Lincoln: "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." And Thomas Jefferson: "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal... " So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary’s hill three men were crucified. We must never forget that all three were crucified for the same crime — the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists. The defining spirit or mood a particular time in history 40.
I had hoped that the white moderate would see this need. Perhaps I was too optimistic; perhaps I expected too much. I suppose I should have realized that few members of the oppressor race can understand the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed race, and still fewer have the vision to see that injustice must be rooted out by strong, persistent and determined action. I am thankful, however, that some of our white brothers in the South have grasped the meaning of this social revolution and committed themselves to it. They are still all too few in quantity, but they are big in quality. Some -such as Ralph McGill, Lillian Smith, Harry Golden, James McBride Dabbs, Ann Braden and Sarah Patton Boyle — have written about our struggle in eloquent and prophetic terms. Others have marched with us down nameless streets of the South. They have languished in filthy, roach infested jails, suffering the abuse and brutality of policemen who view them as "dirty-lovers." Unlike so many of their moderate brothers and sisters, they have recognized the urgency of the moment and sensed the need for powerful "action" antidotes to combat the disease of segregation.

What does Dr. King believe about extremest? Are they necessary? Are they violent and unaccomplishing?

Answer in 3 to 5 sentences, using evidence from the excerpt to support your answer"

Answer 1

Martin Luther King Jr. viewed certain types of extremism as necessary for social change, specifically those rooted in love and justice. He differentiated between negative extremism, which is violent and unproductive, and positive, creative extremism through nonviolent action that can achieve meaningful progress.

Step-by-step explanation:

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that extremists could play a positive role in society if they are extremists for love and justice rather than for hate or injustice. In the 'Letter from Birmingham Jail', King points out that throughout history, influential figures have been labeled as extremists for their unwavering commitment to causes they believed were morally right, such as equality, love, and justice. He argues that the world needs 'creative extremists' to drive social change and progress, highlighting the necessity for action against societal issues like segregation and racial discrimination.

King does not associate extremism with violence or ineffectiveness; instead, he suggests that the nature of one's extremism—whether it is rooted in love and justice or hate and injustice—is what defines its value and impact. He stresses that nonviolent civil disobedience is a form of creative extremism that can lead to positive change, which aligns with his philosophy of peaceful resistance.