124k views
0 votes
In "Twelve Angry Men," how might the biases of the jurors influence jury deliberation and the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial? Focus on the 3rd Juror and the 10th Juror.

A) The 3rd Juror's bias leads to fair deliberation, ensuring a just trial.
B) The 3rd Juror's bias influences him to consider the defendant's innocence.
C) The 10th Juror's bias creates an unbiased deliberation, promoting fairness.
D) The 10th Juror's bias results in prejudice, impacting the fairness of deliberation.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

In "Twelve Angry Men," the biases of the 3rd Juror and the 10th Juror influence the fairness of jury deliberation and the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial.

Step-by-step explanation:

In "Twelve Angry Men," the biases of the jurors can have a significant impact on jury deliberation and the defendant's ability to receive a fair trial. Both the 3rd Juror and the 10th Juror in the play demonstrate biases that affect the fairness of the deliberation process.

The 3rd Juror's bias is against young people, which leads him to believe that the defendant is guilty based on his own personal experiences with his son. This bias influences his judgment and makes him less willing to consider the defendant's innocence objectively.

On the other hand, the 10th Juror's bias is based on racial prejudice. He holds strong negative stereotypes about people from the defendant's racial background. This bias results in prejudice and impacts the fairness of the deliberation. It may prevent him from considering the evidence and the defendant's innocence without prejudice.

User Mstef
by
7.0k points