109k views
4 votes
How did the patriots' tactics in The Battle of Princeton differ from the way they attacked the troops retreating from Concord in 1775?

A) The Patriots used guerrilla warfare in The Battle of Princeton.
B) The Patriots used conventional military tactics in both battles.
C) The Patriots didn't attack the troops retreating from Concord.
D) The Patriots didn't have any specific tactics in either battle.

User Yunas
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

A) The Patriots used guerrilla warfare tactics during the retreat from Concord, whereas they employed more conventional tactics with an element of surprise at the Battle of Princeton, breaking with eighteenth-century military protocols of seasonal fighting.

Step-by-step explanation:

The tactics used by the Patriots in the Battle of Princeton differed significantly from those employed against the retreating British troops from Concord in 1775. During the retreat from Concord, the Patriots utilized guerrilla warfare tactics, where militia and minutemen fired upon the British from cover, using the natural landscape and the element of surprise to their advantage. The British were confined to the road with walls along its sides, allowing the Patriots to attack effectively from hidden positions.

In contrast, the Victory at the Battle of Princeton involved a different tactical approach by George Washington. After crossing the Delaware River and surprising the Hessians at Trenton, Washington continued to employ the element of surprise by attacking the British at Princeton, breaking the eighteenth-century military protocol of seasonal fighting. This strategic approach was more in line with conventional tactics of facing the enemy in open battle rather than the hit-and-run guerrilla tactics seen at Concord.

User John Zablocki
by
7.9k points