Question

In the last ten minutes of the documentary, the interviewees make it clear that if we want to curb the negative impacts of social media, we need to start regulating the platforms the way we do other powerful companies. Should we be regulating these platforms? If so, who would be the regulators? What other ideas do they suggest?

a) Yes, we should regulate them, and government agencies should be the regulators.
b) No, we should not regulate them; self-regulation is sufficient.
c) Yes, we should regulate them, and an independent organization should be the regulators.
d) No, we should not regulate them; the free market should determine their policies.

Answer 1

Due to the significant influence of social media on democracy and society, regulation by government agencies is suggested to mitigate risks like the spread of disinformation and deepfakes. Alternatives include independent regulation and various measures to promote data privacy and limit algorithmic amplification, balancing free speech with democratic protection.

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering the impact of social media on society and democracy, it is apparent that there is a compelling argument for the regulation of these platforms, similar to other influential companies. The spread of fake news, the misuse of technology through deepfakes, and the potential amplification of extremist groups highlight the inherent risks associated with unregulated social media. Therefore, option a) Yes, we should regulate them, and government agencies should be the regulators could be deemed appropriate, as government agencies typically have the mandate to enforce laws and protect the public good. Nonetheless, alternative ideas include offering platforms 'earned immunity' from civil liability, breaking up large companies, legislating interoperability and data portability, and emulating stricter anti-competitive laws like those in the EU.

There is also a proposal to have an independent organization act as a regulator, which aligns with option c). Additionally, strengthening regulations with taxes to deter algorithmic amplification, ensuring user consent for data use, distinguishing between speech and reach, and limiting corporate lobbying represent other suggested measures. It is essential to strike a balance between freedom of speech and the need to curb the proliferation of disinformation and protect democracy, without excessively infringing upon privacy and individual rights.