Final Answer:
The reverend felt responsible for Scoresby because of a personal connection (Option b).
Step-by-step explanation:
The reverend's sense of responsibility for Scoresby was rooted in a deep personal connection they shared. This connection could be familial, stemming from a shared history, or perhaps a mentor-student relationship. Such personal ties often evoke a sense of responsibility and duty, leading the reverend to feel compelled to take care of Scoresby's well-being.
In the intricate tapestry of human relationships, personal connections play a pivotal role in shaping our sense of responsibility. The reverend might have felt a moral obligation to ensure Scoresby's welfare due to the bonds forged through shared experiences or a sense of guardianship. This personal connection likely surpassed mere obligation, making the responsibility more profound and heartfelt.
This sense of duty might not have been arbitrary or random; instead, it could have been a deliberate choice driven by the emotional ties between the reverend and Scoresby. Such personal connections often become the cornerstone of our moral compass, guiding us to fulfill responsibilities with sincerity and care. In summary, the reverend's responsibility for Scoresby was grounded in a personal connection, making it a heartfelt and meaningful commitment.(Option b).