52.2k views
1 vote
If an animal has scales, is that enough information to tell you what Class it belongs in?

a) Yes, scales are unique to specific animal Classes.

b) No, additional characteristics are needed to determine the animal's Class.

c) Yes, scales categorically define an animal's Class.

d) No, scales are irrelevant to animal classification.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

No, having scales is not enough to classify an animal into a specific Class because animal classification requires assessing various other morphological and developmental characteristics, not just the presence of scales.

Step-by-step explanation:

If an animal has scales, this characteristic alone is not sufficient to classify the animal into a specific Class. The correct answer to whether scales are enough information to determine an animal's Class is: b) No, additional characteristics are needed to determine the animal's Class. Animal classification relies on a variety of morphological and developmental characteristics beyond simply having scales, such as symmetry, number of tissue layers, the presence or absence of an internal body cavity, and features of embryological development.

For example, both fish (Class Actinopterygii) and reptiles (Class Reptilia) have scales, but they are classified into different classes due to other anatomical and developmental characteristics. Classification systems are complex and take into account numerous aspects of an organism's structure and development, as well as evolutionary history and genetic makeup.Thus, while scales are a notable feature, they are part of a broader set of criteria used in the animal classification system, which is continuously updated with new scientific information.

User Nazy
by
8.5k points