Question

Argue for and against: the Louisiana Purchase made possible both the success of nineteenth-century American democracy as well as America’s dangerous conviction that it could turn inward in isolation from the world.

a) For: Louisiana Purchase contributed to American democracy
b) Against: Louisiana Purchase hindered American democracy
c) For: Louisiana Purchase led to American isolationism
d) Against: Louisiana Purchase did not lead to American isolationism

Answer 1

The Louisiana Purchase had a complex impact on American democracy and international policy; it helped solidify Jefferson's agrarian vision but raised constitutional and ethical issues, and while it might suggest a step towards isolationism, it also underscored US willingness to engage internationally.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Louisiana Purchase was a significant event in American history, doubling the size of the nation and affecting its democracy and international relations. Arguments for its contribution to American democracy include the expansion of the United States, which provided new lands for farming and bolstered trade through control of the Mississippi River and New Orleans, enhancing the vision of an agrarian republic. Conversely, some argued it hindered democracy due to fears of the expansion of slave states and constitutional concerns over the president's power to acquire new territory, potentially disrupting the balance in representation between the North and the South.

Regarding isolationism, advocates for the idea believe the Purchase allowed America to focus on internal development and westward expansion, possibly fostering an attitude of self-sufficiency and detachment from European conflicts. On the other hand, arguments against it leading to isolationism include the fact that the Purchase itself involved significant international negotiations and set a precedent for future territorial acquisitions, indicating a willingness to engage with other nations for national interests.