Final answer:
Deanna Bratter's approach to the initiative in the article cannot be determined without further context. However, using secondary data in research is considered an unobtrusive method, correctly identified as 'nonreactive.'
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question seems to be inquiring about Deanna Bratter's approach toward an initiative mentioned in an article, which is not provided. Without the context of the article, it is not possible to ascertain whether Bratter's approach is supportive, critical, indifferent, or unclear. Since we cannot determine her stance without the actual content, no definite answer can be given to this specific question.
However, I can address the portion of the question that contains a clear query regarding the nature of using secondary data. Using secondary data is considered an unobtrusive research method, which means that the method does not interfere with the subjects of the study. Among the given options, the correct answer is (a) nonreactive. Secondary data analysis is nonreactive because the data has already been collected, and the research does not involve direct contact with subjects, thus not influencing their behavior or responses.