Question

The most important reason the statement, "Rechargeable batteries are better than nonrechargeable batteries," fails as a valid scientific hypothesis is:

a) It lacks specificity and measurable variables.
b) It is too complex and technical.
c) It doesn't address a scientific question.
d) It is too concise and clear.

Answer 1

A valid scientific hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. The statement, 'Rechargeable batteries are better than nonrechargeable batteries,' fails as a valid scientific hypothesis because it lacks specificity and measurable variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

A valid scientific hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. The statement, 'Rechargeable batteries are better than nonrechargeable batteries,' fails as a valid scientific hypothesis because it lacks specificity and measurable variables. It is a general statement without clear criteria for what constitutes 'better.' To be a valid scientific hypothesis, it would need to be more specific, such as 'Rechargeable batteries last longer than nonrechargeable batteries.' This would allow for a testable experiment to determine the validity of the hypothesis.