Final answer:
The best example of a paradox from 'Sonnet 30' or 'Sonnet 75' is option (d) that through poetry, the beloved's name lives on. This paradox captures the impossibility of literal immortality versus the figurative immortality bestowed by art, wherein the beloved is eternally remembered through verse.
Step-by-step explanation:
The paradox that best illustrates a statement that seems impossible but nevertheless is true in some way, in reference to 'Sonnet 30' and 'Sonnet 75,' is (d) Through verse, the beloved's name lives on. This is because a name living on through poetry seems impossible since a name is an abstract concept without physical life. However, the continued reading and appreciation of the verse keep the memory and essence of the beloved alive, defying the physical limitations of life and death.
This circumstance is paradoxical as it contrasts the literal truth that humans are mortal with the figurative truth that art and poetry can grant a form of immortality to the subject they celebrate. In 'Sonnet 75' by Edmund Spenser, the speaker attempts to immortalize his love by writing her name on the sand, only for the waves to erase it. He then claims that his verse will etch her name in eternity, a notion that seems paradoxical, yet is sustained by the power of poetry.