195k views
3 votes
The Duncan Books Star Readers program is a great initiative to encourage kids to read more. Harvey Gribbin, manager of Duncan Books, says, "We've gotten a lot of positive feedback from families, and last month alone we gave away 127 free books to kids." Teachers have also commented on students' renewed enthusiasm for reading since the start of the program. Which statement best evaluates the evidence used in the passage?

Options:
A. The evidence is relevant because it uses facts and figures to estimate the number of kids who will participate in the program next month.
B. The evidence is irrelevant because it does not include any opinions from the kids who participate in the program.
C. The evidence is relevant because it uses an expert opinion to support the idea that the book program is good.
D. The evidence is irrelevant because it does not explain specifically what the positive feedback was.

User Jdek
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

Option C is the best evaluation of the evidence provided, as it shows relevance through expert opinion and data supporting the program's success in encouraging reading.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that best evaluates the evidence used in the passage regarding the Duncan Books Star Readers program is C. The evidence is relevant because it uses an expert opinion to support the idea that the book program is good. In the context of evaluating evidence, the feedback from families and teachers, as well as the quantitative data of 127 free books given away, offer a multifaceted insight into the program's success. While it's true that the specific opinions of the children participating are not included, the evidence nonetheless supports the program's effectiveness in encouraging reading among youth.

User Ashley Strout
by
7.1k points