Final answer:
Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi have different views on the choices of kapos in concentration camps during the Holocaust. Wiesel sees their choices as understandable given the circumstances, while Levi views them as unjustifiable. It is possible to judge their behavior, considering the impact of their actions on the suffering of others.
Step-by-step explanation:
Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi, two survivors of the Holocaust, have different views on the choices made by kapos, who were prisoners appointed by the Nazis to oversee other prisoners in concentration camps. Wiesel views the choices of kapos as understandable given the circumstances, recognizing that they faced immense pressure to survive and may have engaged in harmful actions to protect themselves. On the other hand, Levi views the choices of kapos as unjustifiable and reprehensible, believing that they willingly collaborated with the Nazis and became complicit in the oppression and suffering of their fellow prisoners.
It is possible to judge the behavior of kapos, as their actions were instrumental in perpetuating the suffering and death of many victims of the Holocaust. While it is important to consider the extreme circumstances and immense pressure they faced, it is still necessary to hold them accountable for their choices. The choices made by kapos reveal the complexities of human behavior in times of extreme duress and highlight the ethical dilemmas individuals may face in survival situations.