Final answer:
Esperanza's statement that diseases have no eyes suggests that diseases do not discriminate and can affect anyone, which aligns with epidemiological understanding that diseases can become endemic, epidemic, or pandemic irrespective of personal characteristics.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Esperanza states, "But I think diseases have no eyes," she likely means that diseases do not discriminate or choose whom they affect based on personal characteristics or circumstances. This expression implies that diseases can impact anyone, regardless of factors such as socio-economic status, race, age, or gender. Hence, the most accurate interpretation of Esperanza's statement is that diseases can affect anyone, and do not deliberately target individuals (Option B). They are impartial, and although their appearance might suggest randomness, many diseases follow patterns that are studied through epidemiology. Such patterns can include how diseases become endemic in certain regions, or how some may evolve into pandemics. However, the idea that diseases have no eyes suggests a deeper understanding that at an individual level, a disease's effect is not selective or influenced by who the person is.