Final answer:
C) -16 where only the location of point T is known and not the relationship between points T and U, the logical conclusion is that if point T is positioned at -16, point U, remaining in the same location, would also be at -16.
Explanation:
Point U's location is also at -16.
Point T's location is given as -16. Assuming both points T and U are on the same number line, if point T is at -16, then point U, existing at the same location on the number line, would also be at -16. Therefore, the location of point U is -16, aligning with the given information of point T's position.
Understanding the given scenario, where only the location of point T is known and not the relationship between points T and U, the logical conclusion is that if point T is positioned at -16, point U, remaining in the same location, would also be at -16.
This is a straightforward deduction, as no directional information or distance between the two points is provided. Therefore, without any additional details, the most feasible inference is that both points are at the same location on the number line.