107k views
3 votes
When you are skeptical of scientific issues in the media, what are you doing?

a) Seeking additional information from reliable sources
b) Questioning the credibility of the media outlet reporting the issue
c) Evaluating the methodology and quality of the scientific study
d) Considering alternative viewpoints and expert opinions

User Ofirski
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Skepticism of scientific issues in media involves critically evaluating sources, claims, and seeking additional information to verify credibility and reliability.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you are skeptical of scientific issues in the media, you are engaging in a critical assessment of the information presented. This skepticism is essential for discerning the credibility and validity of scientific claims encountered in various media.

Evaluating sources is a key part of this process, which involves checking the claims and authenticity of the information provided. You are also seeking additional information from reliable sources to bolster your understanding. This effort includes looking into the background and expertise of the person or entity making the claim, their potential biases, and what they might gain from the claim. Furthermore, assessing whether the evidence and methodology are robust and whether other researchers or expert opinions corroborate the claims are part of a thorough inquiry.

Bearing these considerations in mind, you become better equipped to navigate the complexities of scientific reporting in the media and to make well-informed judgments about its validity.

User Decko
by
7.7k points