Final answer:
Objective journalism presents news in a neutral and unbiased manner, while advocacy/adversarial journalism takes a more subjective approach, advocating for a specific viewpoint or agenda.
Step-by-step explanation:
Advocacy/adversarial journalism and objective journalism are two different approaches to reporting news. Objectivity in journalism aims to present information in a neutral and unbiased manner, providing facts and allowing readers to form their own opinions. Advocacy journalism, on the other hand, is more opinionated and takes a stance on an issue, advocating for a specific viewpoint or agenda.
In objective journalism, reporters strive to report the news objectively without injecting personal bias or opinion. They focus on gathering facts, verifying information, and presenting a balanced view of the story. This type of reporting is commonly seen in traditional news outlets.
Advocacy/adversarial journalism, on the other hand, involves taking a more active role in shaping public opinion and influencing political or social change. Advocacy reporters often have a specific agenda or viewpoint and use their platform to push for their cause or advocate for a particular group.
Overall, the key difference between advocacy/adversarial journalism and objective journalism lies in the level of opinion and bias present in the reporting. Objective journalism aims to provide a balanced view of the story, whereas advocacy journalism takes a more subjective approach.