193k views
4 votes
Inscription on a statue of the bodhisattva Amoghapasat and King Adityawarman from the Malayapura kingdom in Sumatra, Indonesia, circa 1350 CE. Which of the following is an argument in the second paragraph of the inscription regarding King Adityawarman?

a) His spiritual attributes and worldly achievements made him a powerful and legitimate ruler.
b) His attention to the welfare of all of his subjects made him a caring and legitimate ruler.
c) His conquest of all of the surrounding kingdoms in Indonesia made him a legitimate ruler.
d) His knowledge of science and ships in an island kingdom made him an effective and legitimate ruler.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The argument in the inscription regarding King Aditya Warman is that his spiritual attributes and worldly achievements made him a powerful and legitimate ruler, similar to the historical figure of King Ashoka.

Step-by-step explanation:

An argument regarding King Aditya Warman in the second paragraph of the inscription from the Malayapura kingdom in Sumatra, Indonesia, circa 1350 CE, is that his spiritual attributes and worldly achievements made him a powerful and legitimate ruler. This argument aligns with the historical precedence set by other renowned rulers like King Ashoka, who governed with a mix of spiritual benevolence and worldly mastery. Ashoka's transformation from a conquering general to a devoted Buddhist promoting harmony and welfare throughout his empire is particularly emblematic of this blend of spiritual and political governance. Like Ashoka, figures such as King Aditya Warman are often celebrated for using their temporal power to support and patronize religious activities, helping to cultivate their image as righteous and legitimate leaders.

User Matthijs Hollemans
by
8.2k points