Question

You could divide it into 12 parts or into 66 (2/3) to make it even for everybody or make everybody one segment except for 4 people but makes it unfair and not really sharing so you would have to put one in a fraction other in a decimal i guess.

When faced with the task of dividing a limited resource among a group, what are the two primary approaches mentioned in the passage?

A) Dividing it into 12 parts and dividing it into 4 parts
B) Dividing it into 6 parts and dividing it into 2/3 parts
C) Dividing it into 66 parts and dividing it into 4 parts
D) Dividing it into 12 parts and dividing it into 2/3 parts

Answer 1

The two primary approaches to dividing a limited resource mentioned are dividing it into 66 parts and into 4 parts, which corresponds to option C. These methods aim for equal distribution but differ in fairness and practical application depending on the number of recipients.

Step-by-step explanation:

When faced with the task of dividing a limited resource among a group, the two primary approaches mentioned in the passage are: C) Dividing it into 66 parts and dividing it into 4 parts. These methods correspond to creating equal shares for a specified number of recipients, and allowing for fair distribution based on the resources available.

One approach would be to divide the resource into 66 equal parts, which might be appropriate if you have 66 recipients and want to ensure each person gets an exactly equal amount. The other method mentioned involves dividing the resource into just 4 parts, which could potentially be unfair if you have more than four recipients, leading to a situation where some would receive a full part while others might only receive a fraction or none. It's essential to understand basic fractions and division to distribute resources fairly.