Final answer:
If the process had been made easy, we would likely have more than the current 27 amendments to our Constitution today.
Step-by-step explanation:
The process of amending the Constitution was purposely made difficult by the Framers. If the process had been made easy, we would likely have more than the current 27 amendments to our Constitution today. This is because a less rigorous process would have allowed for frequent changes to be made, potentially resulting in a constantly evolving and less stable Constitution. Given the challenging requirements—two-thirds approval in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the state legislatures—it is likely that a simplified process would have resulted in more amendments, perhaps addressing contemporary topics such as women's rights, electoral reform, and responses to judicial interpretations. The current complexity of this process assures that only amendments with widespread support across diverse political and geographical landscapes become part of the Constitution. Considering the stringent criteria and the thousands of proposed amendments, those that have succeeded represent a thorough vetting by both federal and state governments, signifying a broad consensus deemed necessary for amending the nation's guiding document.