Final answer:
Opponents of voter ID laws argue that they disproportionately affect certain groups, create financial barriers, and are unnecessary due to the lack of widespread voter fraud.
Step-by-step explanation:
Opponents of voter ID laws make several political arguments against them. One argument is that these laws disproportionately affect elderly, minority, and low-income groups that tend to vote Democratic. Obtaining photo ID can be costly and burdensome, especially for those who may not have the necessary documents. Studies have shown that requiring a photo ID would prevent citizens aged 18-24, Hispanics, and those without a college education from voting. Additionally, opponents argue that voter ID laws are unnecessary since there is little evidence of widespread voter fraud. These laws can also create financial barriers and disproportionately impact particular groups, such as minorities and the elderly.