Final answer:
The Broussard family, following patterns of French colonists, were a) likely friendly and cooperative towards Native Americans. This alliance was fostered through trade dependencies and the formation of a multicultural and multiracial society.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the soldier’s account, the Broussard family would likely align with the patterns set by the French colonizers, as there isn’t a specific record of the Broussard family’s interactions with the American Indians. The French generally maintained friendly and cooperative relationships with Native Americans.
This was largely due to their reliance on Native American tribes for assistance in the fur trade, which was of greater importance to the French and led to alliances. Considering this context, it can be inferred that French families such as the Broussard's were more likely option A) Friendly and cooperative with the American Indians.
The French rapport with Native Americans was often harmonious because they were interdependent for the fur trade and formed multicultural societies through marriage with Native American women, unlike their European rivals. This cooperative relationship is illustrated through alliances made between French families and Native tribes, as well as through the crucial roles that Native Americans played as guides, such as Sacagawea, who accompanied the Lewis and Clark expedition with her French husband.
In contrasting examples, the British and American colonists faced various challenging interactions with Native tribes. The Iroquois Confederacy, for instance, was divided during the American Revolutionary War, with some tribes siding with the British and causing significant tensions and conflicts with American settlers. Nonetheless, the Broussard family’s behavior would presumably align with the practices of French colonists and reflect a cooperative stance towards Native Americans.