Final answer:
C. By using humor and sarcasm to highlight the absurdity of opposing viewpoints.
Explanation:
In paragraphs 4-5, the author employs rhetoric by utilizing humor and sarcasm to underscore the absurdity of opposing perspectives. Through witty remarks and ironic tones, the author cleverly dismantles the counterarguments, exposing their flaws without directly attacking them.
This approach aims to subtly ridicule the opposing viewpoints, thereby persuading the reader to see the inherent flaws in those arguments. By employing this rhetorical strategy, the author doesn't rely solely on emotional appeal or factual evidence but rather uses a sarcastic lens to shed light on the weaknesses of the opposing stance, ultimately advancing their argument.
This technique seeks to engage the reader through amusement while subtly reinforcing the credibility of the author's viewpoint.
Overall, the author effectively uses humor and sarcasm as rhetorical devices to emphasize the illogical aspects of opposing viewpoints in paragraphs 4-5.