Final answer:
Theodore Roosevelt's Square Deal and Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom were similar in their aims to check the power of large corporations and protect the public interest. Roosevelt's approach involved regulating large businesses, while Wilson's included breaking up monopolies. Both sought to use the federal government to promote fairness for citizens.
Step-by-step explanation:
Theodore Roosevelt's Square Deal and Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom
Theodore Roosevelt’s Square Deal and Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom were both progressive reforms aimed at addressing the issues of the early 20th century concerning monopolies, consumer protection, and government intervention. Roosevelt’s Square Deal emphasized the three Cs: control over corporations, consumer protections, and conservation. He used the federal government as a steward to intervene and protect public interest. Roosevelt's deal focused on regulating trust and big businesses rather than dismantling them. In contrast, Wilson's New Freedom favored breaking up monopolies instead of just regulating them and pushed for government to not expand in size but reduce the power of large businesses. His aim was to remove the so-called 'triple wall of privilege': tariffs, trusts, and high finance. Both aimed to promote fairness for the average citizen and to check the power of large corporations, but they diverged in their approach to how the federal government should be involved in economic matters.
Despite these differences, both platforms were built upon the idea that government should protect the public from the excesses of big business. One notable piece of legislation that came from Wilson's New Freedom was the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 which clarified and strengthened earlier antitrust laws and made trade unions exempt from being considered monopolies.