Final answer:
Lines 65-67 serve as a critical analysis of the horror genre, emphasizing the structural elements and their effects on eliciting emotions, in line with the principles of New Criticism.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lines 65-67 in the criticism likely serve a crucial role in the context of the literary analysis. This sentence most probably encapsulates a key point the critic is making about the horror genre within a certain work or collection of works. The role of the sentence falls within the scope of New Criticism, which is heavily focused on the close reading of the text and emphasizes the importance of analyzing the artistic elements of a work rather than just its content or plot. This approach to criticism would warn against the heresy of paraphrase, a fallacy in which the deep interconnectedness between a text's form and its meaning is overlooked. Hence, the sentence in question is likely addressing a specific aspect of dramatic structure, imitation, and how it evokes emotions like horror, as seen in the provided reference to Aristotle's theory of Tragedy from line XIV of the supplemental material. The sentence might discuss how a text's construction elicits a visceral reaction from the audience, in alignment with the New Critics' viewpoints. In summary, the sentence's role is to provide an analysis that reflects on how the horror genre achieves its effects through the structural elements of literary works, as well as to highlight the importance of these elements in eliciting emotional responses such as fear and pity, integral to the genre.