Final answer:
The acceleration between 2 and 3 seconds is greater than between 5 and 6 seconds since during the latter interval the cyclist is traveling at constant velocity, indicating no acceleration, whereas between 2 and 3 seconds the cyclist could still be accelerating.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine whether the acceleration is greater between 2 and 3 seconds or between 5 and 6 seconds during the bicycle trip, we need to look at the velocity vs. time graph of the cyclist's motion. Since the question doesn't provide a specific velocity vs. time graph, a general approach will be described.
Between 2 and 3 seconds, if the cyclist was still accelerating, the slope of the velocity vs. time graph would be positive, and the value of the slope would represent the acceleration. Whereas, between 5 and 6 seconds, if the cyclist was traveling at a constant velocity (as per the supplied information during the middle 5 minutes of the trip), the velocity vs. time graph would show a horizontal line (zero slope), indicating no acceleration.
Given that no acceleration occurs during constant velocity, and assuming that the question aligns with the provided information (i.e., the initial acceleration of 0.090 m/s² during the first 2.0 min and followed by a constant velocity), one can infer that the acceleration between 2 and 3 seconds must be greater than between 5 and 6 seconds, because between 5 and 6 seconds there is no acceleration at all.