39.1k views
5 votes
If you could walk at a rate of 2 meters per second. it would take you 1.92 x 108 seconds to walk to the moon. Is it more apporpritate to report this time as 1.92 x 108 seconds or 6.09 years? Explain your reasoning.

User Frohlich
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

It is more appropriate to report the time as 6.09 years rather than 1.92 x 10^8 seconds to walk to the moon at a rate of 2 meters per second.

Step-by-step explanation:

The time it would take you to walk to the moon at a rate of 2 meters per second is 1.92 x 10^8 seconds. However, it is more appropriate to report this time as 6.09 years. This is because reporting it in seconds makes the number very large and difficult to comprehend. Converting it to years provides a more relatable and understandable timeframe.

To convert seconds to years, we can use the following formula:

  1. Divide the number of seconds by the number of seconds in a year (60 seconds × 60 minutes × 24 hours × 365.25 days).
  2. Round the result to the nearest hundredth decimal place.

Using this formula, we can calculate that 1.92 x 10^8 seconds is approximately 6.09 years.

User Joey Gennari
by
7.6k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories