39.1k views
5 votes
If you could walk at a rate of 2 meters per second. it would take you 1.92 x 108 seconds to walk to the moon. Is it more apporpritate to report this time as 1.92 x 108 seconds or 6.09 years? Explain your reasoning.

User Frohlich
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

It is more appropriate to report the time as 6.09 years rather than 1.92 x 10^8 seconds to walk to the moon at a rate of 2 meters per second.

Step-by-step explanation:

The time it would take you to walk to the moon at a rate of 2 meters per second is 1.92 x 10^8 seconds. However, it is more appropriate to report this time as 6.09 years. This is because reporting it in seconds makes the number very large and difficult to comprehend. Converting it to years provides a more relatable and understandable timeframe.

To convert seconds to years, we can use the following formula:

  1. Divide the number of seconds by the number of seconds in a year (60 seconds × 60 minutes × 24 hours × 365.25 days).
  2. Round the result to the nearest hundredth decimal place.

Using this formula, we can calculate that 1.92 x 10^8 seconds is approximately 6.09 years.

User Joey Gennari
by
6.9k points