Final Answer:
The signers portrayed their relationship to George III with a sense of loyalty and allegiance, emphasizing their desire for reconciliation. In contrast, their portrayal of the British administration in the colony and Parliament reflected frustration and grievances, highlighting perceived injustices and violations of colonial rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The signers, in expressing loyalty to George III, often sought to convey their continued allegiance to the British Crown despite their differences. Their language in documents like the Declaration of Independence frequently acknowledged the monarch while addressing their grievances with specific policies and actions taken by the British administration. This nuanced portrayal of their relationship with George III reflects a desire for reconciliation rather than outright hostility.
On the other hand, when portraying the British administration in the colony and Parliament, the signers used stronger language to emphasize their discontent. Grievances included issues such as taxation without representation, the quartering of British troops, and restrictions on colonial trade. By contrasting their loyalty to the monarch with their dissatisfaction toward specific policies enacted by British officials, the signers aimed to convey a nuanced perspective on the sources of their grievances and the nature of their struggle for independence.
In summary, the signers employed different tones and rhetoric when discussing their relationship with George III compared to their depiction of the broader British administration. This strategic use of language allowed them to navigate the delicate balance of expressing loyalty to the crown while articulating their grievances against specific actions of the colonial and parliamentary authorities.