Final answer:
The topicality INC argument in policy debate includes interpretation, violation, standards, and voters.
Step-by-step explanation:
The topicality INC argument in policy debate includes several parts, as outlined below:
- Interpretation: This refers to the debater's proposed definition or understanding of a specific term or concept related to the debate topic.
- Violation: This refers to the argument that the opponent's case or argumentation violates the interpretation set forth by the affirmative team.
- Standards: These are the criteria or principles that debaters use to assess whether an argument meets the interpretation and should be considered valid.
- Voters: These are the key issues or impacts that debaters believe should be the primary focus of the judge's decision-making process.