Final answer:
When a court finds that a written contract represents a complete and final statement of the parties' agreement, it means that the contract is considered the entire agreement between the parties and no other terms can be added or modified unless both parties agree.
Step-by-step explanation:
A court's finding that a written contract is complete and final invokes the parol evidence rule, which excludes external evidence from altering the contract's terms unless specific exceptions apply. When a court finds that a written contract represents a complete and final statement of the parties' agreement, it means that the contract is considered the entire agreement between the parties and no other terms can be added or modified unless both parties agree.
For example, let's say two parties enter into a written contract for the sale of a car. The contract details the price, payment terms, and any other relevant terms. If a dispute arises later and one party tries to introduce evidence of a different agreement or additional terms that were not included in the written contract, the court will not consider that evidence because the written contract is deemed to be complete and final.
The purpose of this rule is to promote certainty and prevent parties from changing the terms of a contract after it has already been agreed upon in writing.