Final answer:
False. A constitutional government must not only have a constitution but must also practice constitutionalism, which includes the rule of law, limited government, and protection of individual rights. The statement that the necessary and proper clause limits the power of the national government is false, as it expands Congressional powers. The mere presence of a constitution does not necessarily mean a country has a constitutional government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The definition of a constitutional government indeed includes the presence of a constitution, but it encompasses more than just having that document. A constitutional government not only has a constitution—a framework, blueprint, or foundation for its operation—but it also practices constitutionalism. Constitutionalism implies a system of government with three key elements: the rule of law, limited government, and an element of individualism. This means that the government is bound by law, its powers are limited to protect individuals' liberties, and there's an element of individual rights within its structure.
On the specific question regarding the Constitution's necessary and proper clause, it is clear the intended effect is to empower, rather than to limit, the national government. This clause grants Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying out its duties. Therefore, the statement that the necessary and proper clause has had the effect of limiting the power of the national government is false.
It's important to discern that simply having a constitution does not guarantee a constitutional government. Many countries may have a formal constitution or other forms of unwritten constitutional frameworks that guide the operation of their governments, yet whether or not they have a constitutional government depends on if constitutionalism is practiced, where there is a balance of government power, rule of law, and protection of individual rights.