Final answer:
The conference's decision to endorse other methods for achieving independence, if deemed necessary, directly aligns with the commitment to nonviolent methods in the struggle for independence, showing readiness to adapt as the situation may require. The correct answer is option B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The decision to endorse other methods 'if they are deemed necessary', as mentioned in the report on the All African People's Conference held in Ghana in 1958, is best explained in the context of B. The commitment to nonviolent methods in the struggle for independence. This reflects a strategic and situational flexibility within the broader nonviolent independence movement, which recognized that while nonviolent methods were preferred and central to their efforts, there may be scenarios where additional tactics might be necessary to achieve the overarching goal of independence. This approach aligns with historical patterns in the struggle for independence across Africa, where peaceful methods were initially sought but sometimes gave way to armed struggle in the face of intransigent colonial powers or severe repression.
The urgency of solving the problem of racism in multi-racial areas of Africa was also a significant concern during the conference, as it was believed that the unresolved racial tensions could facilitate the growth of foreign influence, such as that of the Soviet Union, within the continent. This statement, while reflective of a broader geopolitical concern, does not directly relate to the conference's endorsement of potentially more forceful methods if necessary.