Final answer:
The merits of changing the requirements for membership in a group should be evaluated based on the responsibilities of individual members and the need for individual freedom. Changing the requirements can attract more diverse members and fresh perspectives but should be done thoughtfully.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating the merits of changing the requirements for membership in a group, it's important to consider the responsibilities of the individual as a member of the group. These responsibilities can include contributing to the group's activities, legitimizing its objectives, and adding credibility. Additionally, the need for individual freedom in a group should be discussed, as it plays a role in ensuring that members have the autonomy to express their opinions and make decisions within the group.
For example, in a voluntary interest group, changing the membership requirements may help attract more members and increase diversity. This would bring in fresh perspectives and ideas, ultimately benefiting the group's goals. On the other hand, if the requirements are too strict, it could deter potential members and limit the group's growth and effectiveness.
In conclusion, the decision to change the requirements for membership in a group should be carefully evaluated, taking into account the responsibilities of the individual as a member and the need for individual freedom. When done thoughtfully, it can result in a stronger and more inclusive group.