89.3k views
5 votes
A farmer's tomato crop is wilting, and he must decide whether to water it. If he waters the tomatoes, or if it rains, the crop will yield $1,000 in profits; but if the tomatoes get no water they will yield only $500. Operation of the farmer's irrigation system costs $100. The farmer seeks to maximize expected profits from tomato sales. If the farmer believes there is a 50 percent chance of rain, should he water?

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The farmer should water the tomatoes since the expected profit of watering ($900) exceeds the expected profit of not watering ($750), making watering the crop the profit-maximizing decision.

Step-by-step explanation:

The farmer's decision on whether to water the tomatoes should be based on the expected value of each scenario. With a 50 percent chance of rain, the expected profit from not watering is calculated as (0.5 × $1000) + (0.5 × $500) = $750. On the other hand, watering the tomatoes guarantees $1000, minus the $100 watering cost, resulting in a profit of $900. Therefore, the expected profits are higher if the farmer waters the crop.

The farmer should compare the expected profits of each option. Here, watering has an expected profit of $900, whereas not watering has an expected profit of only $750. Since $900 is greater than $750, the profit maximizing decision would be to water the tomatoes, ensuring the highest expected profits.

User Khiav Reoy
by
7.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories