Final answer:
The null hypothesis is that the average claim size is equal to the historical average of $25,500, whereas the alternative hypothesis is that the average claim size is greater than $25,500. Using a one-sample t-test, the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, indicating insufficient evidence to support the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
To test whether the home damage is greater than the historical average, we can use a one-sample t-test.
The null hypothesis is that the average claim size is equal to the historical average of $25,500, and the alternative hypothesis is that the average claim size is greater than $25,500.
Using the given information, we can calculate the t-statistic as follows:
t = (sample mean - population mean) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))
Plugging in the values, we get t = (27,000 - 25,500) / (4,300 / sqrt(22)) ≈ 1.692.
With 21 degrees of freedom (sample size - 1), the critical t-value for a one-tailed test at a 0.02 significance level is about 2.5181.
Since the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the home damage is greater than the historical average.