Final answer:
Carlos and Chip are using hypothesis testing to determine if the proportion of residents using smartphones as the primary online access method at home differs from national data. A p-value of 0.1002 suggests weak evidence against the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
To investigate the proportion of individuals using smartphones as their primary means of online access at home, hypothesis testing can be utilized. When Carlos collects data from a sample of 455 residents, he is looking to see if this proportion is higher in his rural Midwestern area than the national average found by Pew Research. Under the null hypothesis, it is assumed that there is no difference between the local and national proportions.
To conduct the test, Carlos can perform simulations using the national proportion as the expected proportion and then use the results of the simulation to calculate the p-value. The p-value helps determine if the observed sample proportion is statistically significantly different from the national proportion. In a similar study, when Chip finds a p-value of 0.1002, it suggests that there is weak evidence against the null hypothesis and that the null model fits his data reasonably well, meaning there is not a significant difference in the usage patterns in his southern rural area.
When conducting such tests, it is also crucial to consider the level of significance, usually set at 5 percent. Rejecting the null hypothesis implies that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a significant difference between the proportions being compared. If the null is not rejected, it is determined that there is not enough evidence to support that claim.