Final Answer:
(a) E(Y∼) = -3.33, E(Z∼) = 3.33, var(Y∼) = 8.89, var(Z∼) = 8.89. (b) Cumulative distributions of Y∼ and Z∼ would be similar as their means and variances are identical. It's not possible to determine which one is riskier based solely on mean and variance. (c) E[u(Y∼)] = 33.26, E[u(Z∼)] = 33.26. It’s not surprising that E[u(Y∼)] = E[u(Z∼)] due to identical means. (d) For u''' > 0, E[u(Y∼)] would be increasing due to the convexity of the utility function.
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) The expected value of Y∼ is calculated by adding the mean of the 'white noise' (-3.33) to the worst outcome of X∼ (-10), resulting in -3.33. Similarly, the expected value of Z∼ is determined by adding the mean of the 'white noise' (3.33) to the best outcome of X∼ (+10), resulting in 3.33. The variance for both Y∼ and Z∼ is 8.89, as the variance remains the same when adding a constant to a random variable.
(b) The cumulative distributions of Y∼ and Z∼ might not provide conclusive evidence on which is riskier since their means and variances are identical. Although one attaches noise to the worst outcome and the other to the best, these metrics alone don't determine risk. Further analysis beyond mean and variance is needed to ascertain riskiness.
(c) With a quadratic utility function u(w) = w - 0.01w^2, both E[u(Y∼)] and E[u(Z∼)] are calculated to be 33.26. This similarity is anticipated due to the identical means of Y∼ and Z∼, leading to the same expected utility.
(d) For a utility function with u''' > 0, the expected utility, E[u(Y∼)], would be increasing because of the function's convexity. Convexity implies a higher risk aversion, influencing decision-making by favoring more certainty.