Final answer:
The estimation procedure is consistent but not unbiased or asymptotically unbiased.
Step-by-step explanation:
The estimation procedure described is consistent, meaning that as the sample size increases, the estimator will converge to the true population mean. This can be shown by considering two cases. If we draw a number between 2 and n, the estimator will be the sample mean, which is an unbiased and consistent estimator.
If we draw 1, the estimator will be n^2, which is a constant and does not depend on the sample. Therefore, as n becomes large, the probability of drawing 1 becomes negligible, and the estimator converges to the sample mean.
However, the estimation procedure is neither unbiased nor asymptotically unbiased. The estimator assigns a non-zero probability to the value n^2, which introduces bias. As n increases, the probability of drawing 1 becomes negligible, but the bias introduced by using n^2 remains. Therefore, the estimator is biased and does not converge to the population mean as n increases.