118k views
4 votes
How did the balance of power (the legislative and Judicial Branches) handle Roosevelt’s attempts at fixing America?

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

During Roosevelt's attempts to fix America, the balance of power between the legislative and judicial branches was tested. The Supreme Court struck down New Deal laws, prompting Roosevelt to propose a court-packing plan. Although the plan failed, Roosevelt was able to shape the Court through subsequent appointments.

Step-by-step explanation:

During Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempts to fix America through the New Deal programs, he faced opposition from the Supreme Court. The Court struck down several New Deal laws, claiming that they gave too much power to the executive branch. In response, Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, also known as the 'court-packing scheme,' which aimed to increase the number of Supreme Court justices and allow him to appoint justices who would support his policies. However, the bill was met with opposition and never passed.

Despite the failure of the court-packing plan, Roosevelt's presidency resulted in several Supreme Court appointments, as some of the more aged justices retired. This allowed Roosevelt to shape the Court in favor of his administration. Overall, the balance of power between the legislative, judicial, and executive branches played out through conflict and cooperation during Roosevelt's attempts to fix America.

User Peter Pete
by
8.0k points