Question

How was slavery different in Louisiana from slavery in British and Dutch colonies? Choose two examples from the options below:

A) Slavery in Louisiana allowed enslaved individuals to own property and participate in trade, while this was largely prohibited in British and Dutch colonies.
B) Slavery in British and Dutch colonies was characterized by the use of task systems, while slavery in Louisiana relied on gang labor.
C) In Louisiana, enslaved individuals were predominantly involved in rice and indigo cultivation, whereas in British and Dutch colonies, they were primarily engaged in tobacco and cotton farming.
D) British and Dutch colonies often granted enslaved individuals more legal rights and protections compared to the limited rights given to enslaved individuals in Louisiana.

Answer 1

Slavery in Louisiana differed from slavery in British and Dutch colonies in several ways, including the rights of enslaved individuals and labor systems used. The correct options are A and B.

Step-by-step explanation:

Slavery in Louisiana differed from slavery in British and Dutch colonies in a few ways.

1. Slavery in Louisiana allowed enslaved individuals to own property and participate in trade, while this was largely prohibited in British and Dutch colonies. In Louisiana, enslaved individuals could acquire property and engage in trade, giving them some economic autonomy. In contrast, enslaved individuals in British and Dutch colonies generally did not have the same legal rights and freedoms.
2. Slavery in British and Dutch colonies was characterized by the use of task systems, while slavery in Louisiana relied on gang labor. In British and Dutch colonies, enslaved individuals were assigned specific tasks to complete, while in Louisiana, enslaved individuals often worked collectively in large groups under the supervision of overseers.